tragoed Oedipus the King (Oedipus Rex) as Greek Tragedy :: Oedipus the King Oedipus Rex

Oedipus The King as Greek Tragedy  â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â The class of show is wide and contains works of shifted structures and subjects. The principal dramatization, on which every single later work are based, created in Greece and managed strict and social issues. As indicated by Aristotleã•s The Poetics, a Greek Tragedy must arrangement with a genuine reason, stirring a feeling of pity or dread in the crowd. The accentuation must be on plot over character improvement and the writer must use anticipation and solidarity of time, place furthermore, activity. Aristotle composes that a heartbreaking legend is a character who is eminent furthermore, prosperous, not really great, however not a malevolent individual either. The awful legend must meet with an inversion of fortune realized by either indiscretion or on the other hand destiny. In light of these measures, Oedipus the King by Sophocles is thought of the prototypical Greek Tragedy. Oedipus, the playã•s primary character, is too thought about the model of a Greek awful legend. Oedipus the King manages a few genuine purposes, the best of which being the rationalism Sophocles saw in his locale. Through Iokaste who Ã'ã‰would not squander a second thoughtã‰ã on prophets, Sophocles shows his crowd the risks of skepticism in the divine beings, since every prescience made by prophets in the play wound up materializing (l. 813). Sophocles utilizes his play to perform genuine strict capacities just as to engage theater-goers. The satisfaction of the expectations made by the prophets prompted the ruin of Oedipus, which made a purgation in the crowd, brought by stirring sentiments of pity and dread for the fallen ruler. The Choragos gives the exercise, Ã'ã‰let none assume on his favorable luck until he discover life, at his passing, a memory without painã (l. 1473-5). This scene permits the crowd to leave the performance center inclination cleansed of their pity and dread. The plot is the most significant segment of Oedipus the Ruler, all things considered of each Greek Tragedy. Improvement of characters is auxiliary, and the crowd once in a while Ãgets insideã• any of the characters. As it were characters critical to the plot are presented; there is no unessential activity on stage. This advancement of plot is a test. A tragedian must present a story with which the crowd is as of now recognizable and still make it intriguing

Agro Processing Industries Essay

Country Entrepreneurship through Agro-Processing Industries Mrs. P. Geetha, Lecturer in Economics, Sri GVG Visalakshi College for Women, Udumalpet, TamilNadu, India In India there are around 6. 3 million towns and 340 million specialists in rustic disorderly division who contribute 60% of national pay. About 75% of populaces who live in towns need to use the town assets. In provincial zones essentially three sorts of financial exercises are being embraced. These exercises are: essential, auxiliary and tertiary exercises. At the point when we discuss country advancement, the accentuation is on the improvement of horticulture, industry, exchange and administration areas. Among these exercises, horticulture till now is the fundamental word related action in the country regions as a large portion of the populace relies upon farming for their occupation and work. A little incitement will explosive the rustic economy and lead to improved personal satisfaction. Country territories must go after better usage of HR to improve the provincial economy. Advancing agro-based ventures, cabin and little scope enterprises would fill the need of country business advancement. Significance of Agro-Processing Industries Agro preparing could be characterized as set of techno financial exercises did for protection and treatment of farming produce and to make it usable as food, feed, fiber, fuel or modern crude material. Consequently, the agro-handling industry is viewed as the dawn division of the Indian economy. Appropriately created, agro-handling area would energize country business enterprise as well as can make India a significant player at the worldwide level for showcasing and flexibly of prepared food, feed and a wide scope of other plant and creature items. Classes of Agro †Industry I) Village Industries claimed and run by rustic family units with next to no capital venture and an elevated level of physical work. Ex. pickles, papad, and so forth ii) Small scope industry described by medium venture and semi-mechanization. Ex. consumable oil, rice plants, and so forth iii) Large-scale industry including enormous speculation and an elevated level of mechanization. Ex. Sugar, jute, cotton plants, and so on Prospects The agro preparing segment offers scope for advancement of a few enterprises, for example, dissolvable extraction, oleoresins, kinnow/squeezed orange, malt concentrates, gardening and a large group of different things.

American Corporations and Internet Pornography Essay Exploratory Es

In this paper, we will consider the alleged respectable standard American organizations that are harvesting immense benefits from Internet pornography, just as related contemplations. Â Marriott, Westin, and Hilton are known for their obscene video conveyances to paying rooms, a training which Omni Hotels stopped when faced by the American Family Association. Then again, Internet pornography organizations like Yahoo! In its x-evaluated Geocities destinations, was not threatened by AFA's dangers. Rather, it made US Attorney General Ashcroft's solid move to threaten Yahoo! into just a fractional withdrawal from Internet pornography. Nonetheless, Yahoo! Still holds imperceptibly explicit material on sites. Â ATT is simply the greatest American organization that has obliged to the sex entertainment blast. Its link division, ATT Broadband, disperses to endorsers the express pornography channel, The Hot Network; and this has deplorable repercussions in the realm of Internet sex entertainment. In the spring of 2001, an interfaith alliance of relig...

At the Tomb of the Inflatable Pig :: essays research papers

Presentation Through the eyes of a British man Paraguay is imagined as a nation of erraticism and logical inconsistency, of beguilingly individualistic people. As this TP was composed my perspectives was the most significant data source, contradicting the creator in a portion of his announcements. He depicts a messy nation, and with all due respect it isn't that way. Corresponding to the title, in the front of the book is the photograph of a pink pig. It doesn't state why, however I guess that it would be at a bargain in the market and called his consideration. Or on the other hand maybe, the Inflatable Pig was a feeling of its book: Great by outside, vacancy within. AT the Tomb of the Inflatable Pig Is a book about Paraguay composed by John Gimlette, an English legal counselor who has come here in Paraguay for visit. Be that as it may, from its start, the book is loaded with mistakes and tormented of contempt towards Paraguay. â€Å"Paraguay isn't only disengaged, it is nearly impenetrable†, for what reason does he said that? Our nation is available to go in and out, for my own understanding, Paraguay is neither disconnected nor invulnerable, and I would go with no issue by any stretch of the imagination, in the event that I had the methods. Business when all is said in done terms is acceptable here, we import as much as we trade. â€Å"It has become an asylum to Nazis, barbarians, odd sixteenth-century Anabaptists, White Russians and fabulous animals that should quite a while in the past to have been extinct†. â€Å"The Paraguayans portray their landlocked country as ‘South America’s Switzerland’. In truth, it is its Cinderella†. I don't know any individual who imagines that Paraguay is the ‘South America’s Switzerland’ as he referenced. â€Å"A side-effect of Paraguay’s solid family relationship and oral conventions is that nobody concu rs on anything. History is to a great extent a matter of opinion†, once more, he is totally off-base, why he didn't solicit some from the great, brilliant students of history that this nation has. It depicts the life in Paraguay of that time so magnificently that it is particular that a man so misled as Gimlette that composes a book tormented of blunders, has called the consideration of the â€Å"elite press†, North American. The book was distributed initially by Hutchinson in London, in 2002. The U.S.A. form just got out. - This is the subsequent book as of late composed by an English about Paraguay. In both, the authors didn't ration poison.

The Rats in the Tunnel

The Rats in the Tunnel There is a light at the end of the tunnel: we all know this. Even when it’s hard to find, we know it’s there, just beyond the bend. Finding the light isn’t the hardest part of life’s journey: it’s dealing with what’s hiding in the tunnel. What lurks in the darkness keeps us from focusing on the light. Anytime we visit New York City, we might see oversized rats scurrying down the blackened train tracks below the subway platform. If we jump down and walk those tracks, we will find the light at the end of the subway tunnelâ€"eventually. Finding the light isn’t what worries us: what worries us are the rats in the tunnel. We must contend with whatever stalks the darkness, what waits to trip us up and keep us from the light. The rats are no different from the plethora of obstacles getting in our way every dayâ€"the mundane tasks, the banal distractions, the vapid, harmful ways we pacify ourselves. Minimalism allows us to remove those obstacles and focus on the light; it allows us to shoo the rats from the tunnel and find the light more quickly. Minimalism allows us to swiftly exit the tunnel and avoid the malevolent, filthy creatures lurking in the darkness. And the light is so much brighter when you get out of the tunnel. What are your rats? What keeps you in the tunnel, hidden from the light? Shopping? Television? Internet? Debt? Clothes? Gadgets and consumer electronics? Overeating? Something else? What can you get rid of to focus on the light? What can you remove from your life to make it more meaningful? Read this essay and 150 others in our new book, Essential.

Israeli-Palestinian Water Rights - Free Essay Example

The Israeli-Palestinian bilateral negotiations in the 1990s resulted in three signed agreements that related, inter alia, to water: the Declaration of Principles of September 1993; the Cairo Agreement of May 1994 (Oslo I); and the Interim Agreement of September 1995 (Oslo II).[1] Oslo II included Article 40 à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" Water and Sewage.[2] These agreements, like all agreements relating to the Oslo process were in favor of Israel and in prejudice to all Palestinian rights, including water rights. First, they neglected the Palestinian water rights in the Jordan River which is a trans-boundary river,[3] and were geographically limited to only those parts of the Mountain Aquifer that underlie the West Bank, while the other water resources in the OPT remained under unilateral Israeli management.[4] Second, the agreements were about the Palestinian use of water inside the West Bank and gave Israel the veto over any water development projects through the Joint Water Commi ttee (JWC),[5] which was established according to the Oslo II to implement the agreement and govern management of aquifers shared by Israel and Palestinians.[6] Third, although they recognized the Palestinian water rights, the terms were broad and there was no elaboration on the nature of these rights or the principles governing the rights and obligations of both sides.[7] While Israel has in principle recognized Palestinian water rights, its conduct suggests otherwise, and the Oslo Accords did not result in greater access for the Palestinians to the water resources of the OPT.[8] The agreements stipulated that Israel would provide an additional 70-80 MCM/Y in order to satisfy future Palestinian needs.[9] However, of this quantity which was supposed to be provided by Israel, only 28.6 MCM/Y has been received by Palestinians, who were allowed to extract this quantity from the eastern aquifer over which Israel has no claim.[10] In fact, Palestinian water supplies have dropped from 118 MCM/Y prior to the Oslo Accords to 98 MCM/Y in 2010.[11] Water is inherent in each issue to be discussed in the permanent status negotiations, which were supposed to be completed by May 1999, be it borders, settlements, Jerusalem or the viability of the Palestinian state.[12] The Oslo process did not come close to fulfilling Palestinian water rights and needs or meeting the Palestinian call for the implementation of international law to solve such a dispute.[13] They even perpetuated Israels control over water resources in the OPT. . 2.2.1. The Role of the JWC Under article 40 of Oslo II, which pertains to water and sewage management in the West Bank, any water project implemented in the West Bank must receive prior unanimous approval from the Joint Water Committee (JWC), which comprises representatives of both the Israeli Water Authority and the Palestinian Authority (PA).[14] The JWCs role is to implement Article 40, including water allocation and project appraisal, but only in the West Bank.[15] The PA must obtain the JWCs consent even for projects responding to emergency water needs.[16] Israel, through the JWC, not only refuses projects on a technical level but also uses its power of veto as a political bargaining chip.[17] In order to avoid the Israelà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s veto, the PA must often compromise its core principles and long-term interests.[18] When seeking to acquire approval for projects that are necessary to mitigate ongoing and imminent humanitarian crises, the PA must frequently agree to service illegal Israeli sett lements in the West Bank.[19] For instance, in 1998, the Palestinian Water Authority received funding from KfW (the German government-owned development bank) to build a wastewater treatment plant in the Salfit Governorate.[20] The JWC made approval of the project conditional upon connecting the largest West Bank settlement, Ariel, to the treatment plant.[21] The Palestinian Water Authority rejected any act recognizing settlements, so the project was frozen and the donor withdrew.[22] Israel has frustrated Palestinian water sector development in the West Bank through its de facto veto authority over all West Bank water projects by the JWC and the Civil Administration.[23] Whilst theoretically Israelis and Palestinians are given equal rights and responsibilities under the JWC, the JWC de facto discriminates against Palestinians.[24] This is primarily because the Palestinians are the party that needs major infrastructure development in the water and sanitation sector that has been b adly neglected by the occupation authorities since 1967.[25] As of July 2008, 145 Palestinian projects were pending the JWCs approval, including projects to rehabilitate old water supply networks, build new pipelines to connect communities un-served by the water network, and build cisterns for rainwater harvesting.[26] All proposed water projects in the West Bank must receive approval from the Israeli representatives in the JWC, while there is no analogous check on projects proposed by Israeli authorities within that countryà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s own borders or inside the West Bank although article 40 requires Israeli authorities and settlements in the West Bank to obtain prior approval from the JWC.[27] In addition, the absence of a dispute resolution mechanism leaves the Palestinians without recourse to challenge JWCs rejection of their proposals.[28] Israels control of extraction of water from the shared aquifers is not limited to its veto power in the JWC over new drillings.[29] In addition to receiving the JWCs approval, all proposed water projects that could impact Area C (a geographic region encompassing roughly sixty percent of the West Bank which is under full Israeli control according to the Oslo Accords) must obtain the Israeli Civil Administrations approval.[30] Obtaining the Civil Administrations approval entails a lengthy and protracted bureaucratic process and many Palestinian applications are rejected.[31] In many cases, project proposals receive approval from the JWC, but they are rejected by the Civil Administration as presenting a security risk, among other reasons.[32] Even if the Civil Administration agrees to authorize a proposal, it may require certain modifications of the original plan, which the PA must then re-submit for approval by the JWC.[33] When projects may ultimately win approval from both the JWC and Civil Administration, the lengthy process and procedural barriers obstruct and delay development of the Palestinian water sector in the West Bank.[34] Of the 236 projects overall approved by the JWC 1996-2008, 151 have been implemented.[35] Israel wants the JWC to continue as a permanent institution. It wants to force the Palestinians through the JWCs measures to reduce agricultural water, to stop drilling additional wells, and not to impact the current Israeli utilization of water.[36] In conclusion, the mechanism created by Oslo II in the form of the JWC has perpetuated Israels exclusive control over the water resources of the West Bank, and limited Palestinian access and ability to develop new water projects.[37] In reality, the Oslo II water regime maintained of Israelà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s exclusive control over e water resources in the OPT.[38] The Palestinians are systematically denied building and/or drilling permits for water structures, while Mekorot is allowed to drill into water sources in a manner that dries out existing wells that serve the Palestinian population.[39] [1] BTselem, Thirsty For A Solution The Water Crisis In The Occupied Territories And Its Resolution In The Final-Status Agreement (2000) 51. [2] Al Haq, Water for One People: Discriminatory Access and Water Apartheid in the OPT (2013)35. [3] Amjad Aliewi, Management Aspects of Transboundary Waters between Palestinians and Israel (House of Water and Environment 2008) 1 [4] Al Haq, Water for One People: Discriminatory Access and Water Apartheid in the OPT (2013)36. [5] Amjad Aliewi, Management Aspects of Transboundary Waters Between Palestinians And Israel (House of Water and Environment 2008) 1. [6] Jeffrey D. Stein, Waging Waterfare: Israel, Palestinians, and the Need for a New Hydro-Logic to Govern Water Rights under Occupation (2011) 44 NYU International Law and Politics, 181. [7] Elizabeth G Matthews, The Israel-Palestine Conflict (Routledge 2011) 128. [8] Al Haq, Water for One People: Discriminatory Access and Water Apartheid in the OPT (2013) 36 [9] D avid B Brooks and Ozay Mehmet, Water Balances in the Eastern Mediterranean (IDRC 2000) 79. [10] David B Brooks and Ozay Mehmet, Water Balances in the Eastern Mediterranean (IDRC 2000) 79. [11] Al Haq, Water for One People: Discriminatory Access and Water Apartheid in the OPT (2013) 36. [12] Elizabeth G Matthews, The Israel-Palestine Conflict (Routledge 2011) 129. [13] Elizabeth G Matthews, The Israel-Palestine Conflict (Routledge 2011) 130. [14] Jeffrey D. Stein, Waging Waterfare: Israel, Palestinians, and the Need for a New Hydro-Logic to Govern Water Rights under Occupation (2011) 44 NYU International Law and Politics, 181. [15] World Bank, Assessment of and Restrictions on Palestinian Water Sector Development (2009) 51. [16] Jeffrey D. Stein, Waging Waterfare: Israel, Palestinians, and the Need for a New Hydro-Logic to Govern Water Rights under Occupation (2011) 44 NYU International Law and Politics, 181. [17] Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions, Polici es of Denial: Lack of Access to Water in the West Bank (2008) 22. [18] Jeffrey D. Stein, Waging Waterfare: Israel, Palestinians, and the Need for a New Hydro-Logic to Govern Water Rights under Occupation (2011) 44 NYU International Law and Politics, 181. [19] Jeffrey D. Stein, Waging Waterfare: Israel, Palestinians, and the Need for a New Hydro-Logic to Govern Water Rights under Occupation (2011) 44 NYU International Law and Politics, 181. [20] Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions, Policies of Denial: Lack of Access to Water in the West Bank (2008) 22. [21] Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions, Policies of Denial: Lack of Access to Water in the West Bank (2008) 22 [22] World Bank, Assessment of and Restrictions on Palestinian Water Sector Development (2009) 41. [23] Jeffrey D. Stein, Waging Waterfare: Israel, Palestinians, and the Need for a New Hydro-Logic to Govern Water Rights under Occupation (2011) 44 NYU International Law and Politics, 181. [24] Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions, Policies of Denial: Lack of Access to Water in the West Bank (2008) 21. [25] Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions, Policies of Denial: Lack of Access to Water in the West Bank (2008) 21-22. [26] Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions, Policies of Denial: Lack of Access to Water in the West Bank (2008)22. [27] Jeffrey D. Stein, Waging Waterfare: Israel, Palestinians, and the Need for a New Hydro-Logic to Govern Water Rights under Occupation (2011) 44 NYU International Law and Politics, 182. [28] Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions, Policies of Denial: Lack of Access to Water in the West Bank (2008) 22. [29] BTselem, Thirsty For A Solution: The Water Crisis in the Occupied Territories and Its Resolution in the Final-Status Agreement (2000) 33. [30] Jeffrey D. Stein, Waging Waterfare: Israel, Palestinians, and the Need for a New Hydro-Logic to Govern Water Rights under Occupation (2011) 44 NYU International Law and Politics, 182. [31] BTselem, Thirsty For A Solution: The Water Crisis in the Occupied Territories and Its Resolution in the Final-Status Agreement (2000) 33. [32] Jeffrey D. Stein, Waging Waterfare: Israel, Palestinians, and the Need for a New Hydro-Logic to Govern Water Rights under Occupation (2011) 44 NYU International Law and Politics, 182. [33] Jeffrey D. Stein, Waging Waterfare: Israel, Palestinians, and the Need for a New Hydro-Logic to Govern Water Rights under Occupation (2011) 44 NYU International Law and Politics, 182. [34] Jeffrey D. Stein, Waging Waterfare: Israel, Palestinians, and the Need for a New Hydro-Logic to Govern Water Rights under Occupation (2011) 44 NYU International Law and Politics, 182. [35] World Bank, Assessment of and Restrictions on Palestinian Water Sector Development (2009) 52. [36] Hillel Shuval and Hassan Dweik, Water Resources In The Middle East (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007)27. [37] Malvina Khoury, Construction and Rehabilitati on of Water Sources in Area C: An Overview of the Applicable Legal and Permit Regime (Norwegian Refugee Council 2013) 10. [38] Al Haq, Water for One People: Discriminatory Access and Water Apartheid in the OPT (2013) 17. [39] Malvina Khoury, Construction and Rehabilitation of Water Sources in Area C: An Overview of the Applicable Legal and Permit Regime (Norwegian Refugee Council 2013) 10.

How Long Have Humans Been Making Things Out of Glass

Glass is an inorganic solid material that is usually clear or translucent with different colors. It is hard, brittle, and stands up to the effects of wind, rain or sun. Glass has been used for various kinds of bottles and utensils, mirrors, windows and more. It is thought to have been first created around 3000 BC, during the bronze age. Egyptian glass beads date back to about 2500 BC. Mosaic Glass Modern glass originated in Alexandria during the Ptolemaic period, artisans created mosaic glass in which slices of colored glass were used to create decorative patterns. Glassblowing Glassblowing was invented during the 1st century BC by the glassmakers of Syria. Lead Crystal Glass During the 15th century in Venice, the first clear glass called Cristallo was invented and then heavily exported. In 1675, glassmaker George Ravenscroft invented lead crystal glass by adding lead oxide to Venetian glass. Sheet Glass On March 25, 1902, Irving W Colburn patented the sheet glass drawing machine, making the mass production of glass for windows possible. Glass jars and Bottles On August 2, 1904, a patent for a glass shaping machine was granted to Michael Owen. The immense production of bottles, jars and other containers owes its inception to this invention. Reference Websites History of Stained GlassGlass EncyclopediaPioneers in the Optical SciencesCarl ZeissHistory of Bausch Lomb Incorporated Continue   MirrorsEye Glasses SunglassesContact Lenses The history of mirrors dates back to ancient times when mankind first saw reflections in a pond or river and considered it magic. Polished stone or metal was used in the first early man-made mirrors. Later glass was used in combination with metals like tin, mercury, and lead to create mirrors. Today, combining glass and metal is still the design used in almost all modern mirrors. Mirrors made by coating flat glass with silver or gold foil dates from Roman times and the inventor is unknown. Definition of a Mirror The definition of a mirror is a reflecting surface that forms an image of an object when light rays coming from that object fall upon the surface. Types of Mirror A plane mirror which is flat, reflects light without changing the image. A convex mirror looks like an upside-down bowl, in a convex mirror objects look bigger in the center. In a concave mirror which has a bowl shape, objects look smaller in the center. The concave parabolic mirror is the principal element of a reflecting telescope. Two-way Mirrors The two-way mirror was originally called the transparent mirror. The first US patent goes to Emil Bloch, a subject of the Emperor of Russia residing at Cincinnati, Ohio -- U.S. patent No.720,877, dated February 17th 1903. Just like a regular mirror there is a silver coating on the glass of a two-way mirror which when applied to the back of the glass renders the glass opaque and reflective on its face under ordinary light conditions. But unlike a regular mirror, a two-way mirror is transparent when strong light is flashed in the rear. Continue GlassEye Glasses SunglassesContact Lenses Around 1000AD, the first vision aid was invented (inventor unknown) called a reading stone, which was a glass sphere that was laid on top of the material to be read that to magnified the letters. Around 1284 in Italy, Salvino DArmate is credited with inventing the first wearable eye glasses. This picture is a reproduction copied from an original pair of eyeglasses dating back to the mid-1400s. Sunglasses Around the year 1752, eyeglass designer James Ayscough introduced his spectacles with double-hinged side pieces. The lenses were made of tinted glass as well as clear. Ayscough felt that white glass created an offensive glaring light, that was bad to the eyes. He advised the use of green and blue glasses. Ayscough glasses were the first sunglass like eyeglasses, but they were not made to shield the eyes from the sun, they corrected for vision problems. Foster Grants Sam Foster started the Foster Grant Company in 1919. In 1929, Sam Foster sold the first pair of Foster Grants sunglasses at the Woolworth on the Atlantic City Boardwalk. Sunglasses became popular in the 1930s. Polarizing Sunglass Lenses Edwin Land invented a cellophane-like polarizing filter patented in 1929. This was the first modern filter to polarize light. Polarizing celluloid became the critical element in creating polarizing sunglass lenses that reduces light glare. In 1932, Land along with Harvard physics instructor, George Wheelwright III, founded the Land-Wheelwright Laboratories in Boston. By 1936, Land had experimented with numerous types of Polaroid material in sunglasses and other optical devices. In 1937, Edwin Land founded the Polaroid Corporation and began to use his filters in Polaroid sunglasses, glare-free automobile headlights and stereoscopic (3-D) photography. However, Land is best known for his invention and marketing of instant photography. Reference Websites History of EyeglassesThe oldest known lens was found in the ruins of ancient Nineveh and was made of polished rock crystal, an inch and one-half in diameter. The rest of the history disputes the next listing. SpectaclesInventors Bacon, Keppler, Franklin, Airy, and Fick. BifocalsEye glasses that see near and far. Continue GlassMirrorsContact Lenses Adolph Fick first thought of making glass contact lenses in 1888, but it took until 1948 when Kevin Tuohy invented the soft plastic lens for contacts to become a reality. Reference Websites Contact Lenses History Continue GlassMirrorsEye Glasses Sunglasses